Mystery and Excellence on The Human Body - The Will To Live

The Will to Live
and
Healing

Norman Cousins, author of the book from which we are  presenting an extract, was a senior lecturer at the School  of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, and  consulting editor of "Man & Medicine", published at the  College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University.  For almost all of his professional life, Norman Cousins  was affiliated with "Saturday Review ". He became its editor in 1940, a position he held for more than thirty years.  Mr. Cousins is the author of eleven books, including  Dr. Schweitzer of Lambarene, The Celebration of Life,  Present Tense, In place of Folly, The Good Inheritance,  and Modern Man Is Obsolete. Norman Cousins died a few  years ago.

per hour — is generally proportionate to the severity of an inflammation or infection. A normal illness, such as grippe, might produce a sedimentation reading of, say, 30 or even 40. When the rate goes well  beyond 60 or 70, however, the physician knows that he is dealing with  more than a casual health problem. I was hospitalized when the sed  rate hit 88. Within a week it was up to 115, generally considered to be a  sign of a critical condition.

There were other tests, some of which seemed to me to be more an  assertion of the clinical capability of the hospital than of concern for  the well-being of the patient. I was astounded when four technicians  from four different departments took four separate and substantial  blood samples on the same day. That the hospital didn't take the trouble to coordinate the tests, using one blood specimen, seemed to me  inexplicable and irresponsible. Taking four large slugs of blood the  same day even from a healthy person is hardly to be recommended.  When the technicians came the second day to fill their containers with  blood for processing in separate laboratories, I turned them away and  had a sign posted on my door saying that I would give just one specimen every three days and that I expected the different departments to  draw from one vial for their individual needs....

My doctor did not quarrel with my reservations about hospital procedures. I was fortunate to have as a physician a man who was able to  put himself in the position of the patient. Dr. William Hitzig supported  me in the measures I took to fend off the random sanguinary assaults of  the hospital laboratory attendants.

We had been close friends for more than twenty years, and he knew  of my own deep interests in medical matters. We had often discussed  articles in the medical press, including the New England Journal of  Medicine (NEJM), and Lancet. He was candid with me about my case.  He reviewed the reports of the various specialists he had called in as  consultants. He said there was no agreement on a precise diagnosis.  There was, however, a consensus that I was suffering from a serious  collagen illness — a disease of the connective tissue. All arthritic and  rheumatic diseases are in this category. Collagen is the fibrous sub stance that binds the cells together. In a sense, then, I was coming  unstuck. I had considerable difficulty in moving my limbs and even in  turning over in bed. Nodules appeared on my body, gravel-like sub stances under the skin, indicating the systemic nature of the disease. At

the low point of my illness, my jaws were almost locked.

Dr. Hitzig called in experts from Dr. Howard Rusk's rehabilitation  clinic in New York. They confirmed the general opinion, adding the  more particularized diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis, which would  mean that the connective tissue in the spine was disintegrating.

I asked Dr. Hitzig about my chances for full recovery. He levelled  with me, admitting that one of the specialists had told him I had one  chance in five hundred. The specialist had also stated that he had not  personally witnessed a recovery from this comprehensive condition.

All this gave me a great deal to think about. Up to that time, I had  been more or less disposed to let the doctors worry about my condition.  But now I felt a compulsion to get into the act. It seemed clear to me  that if I was to be that one in five hundred I had better be something  more than a passive observer.

I asked Dr. Hitzig about the possible origin of my condition. He said  that it could have come, for example, from heavy-metal poisoning, or it  could have been the after-effect of a streptococcal infection.

I thought as hard I could about the sequence of events immediately  preceding the illness. I had gone to the Soviet Union in July 1964 as  chairman of an American delegation to consider the problems of cultural exchange. The conference had been held in Leningrad, after which  we went to Moscow for supplementary meetings. Our hotel was in a  residential area. My room was on the second floor. Each night a pro cession of diesel trucks plied back and forth to a nearby housing project in the process of round-the-clock construction. It was summer, and  our windows were wide open. I slept uneasily each night and felt  somewhat nauseated on arising. On our last day in Moscow, at the air port, I caught the exhaust spew of a large jet at point-blank range as it  swung around on the tarmac.

As I thought back on that Moscow experience, I wondered whether  the exposure to the hydrocarbons from the diesel exhaust at the hotel  and at the airport had anything to do with the underlying cause of the  illness. If so, that might account for the speculations of the doctors concerning heavy-metal poisoning. The trouble with this theory, however,  was that my wife, who had been with me on the trip, had no ill effects  from the same exposure. How likely was it that only one of us would have reacted adversely?

It seemed to me, as I thought about it, that there were two possible

explanations for the different reactions. One had to do with individual  allergy. The second was that I could have been in a condition of adrenal  exhaustion and less apt to tolerate a toxic experience than someone  whose immunologic system was fully functional.

Was adrenal exhaustion a factor in my own illness?

Again, I thought carefully. The meetings in Leningrad and Moscow  had not been casual. Paper work had kept me up late nights. I had ceremonial responsibilities. Our last evening in Moscow had been, at least  for me, an exercise in almost total frustration. A reception had been  arranged by the chairman of the Soviet delegation at his dacha, located  thirty-five to forty miles outside the city. I had been asked if I could  arrive an hour early so that I might tell the Soviet delegates something  about the individual Americans who were coming to dinner. The  Russians were eager to make the Americans feel at home, and they had  thought such information would help them with the social amenities.

I was told that a car and driver from the government automobile  pool in Moscow would pick me up at the hotel at 3:30 P.M. This would  allow ample time for me to drive to the dacha by 5:00, when all our  Russian conference colleagues would be gathered for the social briefing. The rest of the Americans delegation would arrive at the dacha at  6:00 P.M.

At 6:00, however, I found myself in open country on the wrong side  of Moscow. There had been a misunderstanding in the transmission o£  directions to the driver, the result being that we were some eighty miles  off course. We finally got our bearings and headed back to Moscow.  Our chauffeur had been schooled in cautious driving; he was not disposed to make up lost time. I kept wishing for a driver with a compulsion to prove that auto racing, like baseball, originally came from the  U.S.S.R.

We didn't arrive at the dacha until 9:00 P.M. My host's wife looked  desolate. The soup had been heated and reheated. The veal was dried  out. I felt pretty wrung out myself. It was a long flight back to the  States the next day. The plane was overcrowded. By the time we  arrived in New York, cleared through the packed customs counters, and  got rolling back to Connecticut, I could feel an uneasiness deep in my  bones. A week later I was hospitalized.

As I thought back on my experience abroad, I knew that I was probably on the right track in my search for a cause of the illness. I found

myself increasingly convinced, as I said a moment ago, that the reason  I was hit hard by the diesel and jet pollutants, whereas my wife was  not, was that I had a case of adrenal exhaustion, lowering my resistance.

Assuming this hypothesis was true, I had to get my adrenal glands functioning properly again and to restore what Walter B. Cannon, in his  famous book. The Wisdom of the Body, called homeostasis.

I knew that the full functioning of my endocrine system — in particular the adrenal glands — was essential for combating severe arthritis or, for that matter, any other illness. A study I had read in the medical press reported that pregnant women frequently have remissions of  arthritic or other rheumatic symptoms. The reason is that the endocrine  system is fully activated during pregnancy.

How was I to get my adrenal glands and my endocrine system, in general, working well again?

I remember having read, ten years or so earlier, Hans Selye's classic  book. The Stress of Life. With great clarity, Selye showed that adrenal  exhaustion could be caused by emotional tension, such as frustration or  suppressed rage. He detailed the negative effects of the negative emotions on body chemistry.

The inevitable question arose in my mind: what about the positive  emotions? If negative emotions produce negative chemical changes in  the body, wouldn't the positive emotions produce positive chemical  changes? Is it possible that love, hope, faith, laughter, confidence, and  the will to live have therapeutic value? Do chemical changes occur only on the downside?

Obviously, putting the positive emotions to work was nothing so  simple as turning on a garden hose. But even a reasonable degree of  control over my emotions might have a salutary physiologic effect. Just  replacing anxiety with a fair degree of confidence might be helpful.

A plan began to form in my mind for systematic pursuit of the salutary emotions, and I knew that I would want to discuss it with my doctor. Two preconditions, however, seemed obvious for the experiment.  The first concerned my medication. If that medication were toxic to  any degree, it was doubtful whether the plan would work. The second  precondition concerned the hospital. I knew I would have to find a  place somewhat more conducive to a positive outlook on life.

Let's consider these preconditions separately.

First, the medication. The emphasis had been on pain-killing drugs  — aspirin, phenylbutazone (butazolidine), codeine, colchicine, sleeping pills. The aspirin and phenylbutazone were anti-inflammatory and  thus were therapeutically justifiable. But I wasn't sure they weren't  also toxic. It developed that I was hypersensitive to virtually all the  medication I was receiving. The hospital had been giving me maximum  dosages: twenty-six aspirin tablets and twelve phenylbutazone tablets a  day. No wonder I had hives all over my body and felt as though my  skin were being chewed up by millions of red ants.

It was unreasonable to expect positive chemical changes to take  place so long as my body was being saturated with, and toxified by,  pain-killing medications. I had one of my research assistants at the  "Saturday Review" look up the pertinent references in the medical  journals and found that drugs like phenylbutazone and even aspirin  levy a heavy tax on the adrenal glands. I also learned that phenylbutazone is one of the most powerful drugs being manufactured. It can produce bloody stools, the result of its antagonism to fibrinogen. It can  cause intolerable itching and sleeplessness. It can depress bone mar row.

Aspirin, of course, enjoys a more auspicious reputation, at least  with the general public. The prevailing impression of aspirin is that it is  not only the most harmless drug available but also one of the most  effective. When I looked into research in the medical journals, however, I found that aspirin is quite powerful in its own right and warrants  considerable care in its use. The fact that it can be bought in unlimited  quantities without prescription or doctor's guidance seemed indefensible. Even in small amounts, it can cause internal bleeding. Articles in  the medical press reported that the chemical composition of aspirin,  like that of phenylbutazone, impairs the clotting function of platelets,  disc-shaped substances in the blood.

It was a mind-boggling train of thought. Could it be, I asked myself,  that aspirin, so universally accepted for so many years, was actually  harmful in the treatment of collagen illnesses such as arthritis?

The history of medicine is replete with accounts of drugs and modes  of treatment that were in use for many years before it was recognized  that they did more harm that good. For centuries, for example, doctors  believed that drawing blood from patients was essential for rapid  recovery from virtually every illness. Then, midway through the nineteenth

century, it was discovered that bleeding served only to weaken  the patient. King Charles II's death is believed to have been caused in  part by administered bleedings. George Washington's death was also  hastened by the severe loss of blood resulting from this treatment.

Living in the second half of the twentieth century, I realized, confers no automatic protection against unwise or even dangerous drugs  and methods. Each age has had to undergo its own special nostrums.  Fortunately, the human body is a remarkably durable instrument and  has been able to withstand all sorts of prescribed assaults over the centuries, from freezing to animal dung.

Suppose I stopped taking aspirin and phenylbutazone? What about  the pain? The bones in my spine and practically every joint in my body  felt as though I had been run over by a truck.

I knew that pain could be affected by attitudes. Most people become  panicky about almost any pain. On all sides they have been so bombarded by advertisements about pain that they take this or that analgesic at the slightest sign of an ache. We are largely illiterate about pain  and so are seldom able to deal with it rationally. Pain is part of the  body's magic. It is the way the body transmits a sign to the brain that  something is wrong. Leprous patients pray for the sensation of pain.  What makes leprosy such a terrible disease is that the victim usually  feels no pain when his extremities are being injured. He loses his fingers or toes because he receives no warning signal.

I could stand pain so long as I knew that progress was being made  in meeting the basic need. That need, I felt, was to restore the body's  capacity to halt the continuing breakdown of connective tissue.

There was also the problem of the severe inflammation. If we dispensed with the aspirin, how would we combat the inflammation? I  recalled having read in the medical journals about the usefulness of  ascorbic acid in combating a wide number of illnesses — all the way  from bronchitis to some types of heart disease. Could it also combat  inflammation? Did vitamin C act directly, or did it serve as a starter for  the body's endocrine system — in particular, the adrenal glands? Was  it possible, I asked myself, that ascorbic acid had a vital role to play in  "feeding" the adrenal glands?

I had read in the medical press that vitamin C helps to oxygenate  the blood. If inadequate or impaired oxygenation was a factor in collagen breakdown, couldn't this circumstance have been another argument

for ascorbic acid? Also, according to some medical reports, people suffering from collagen diseases are deficient in vitamin C. Did this  lack mean that the body uses up large amounts of vitamin C in the  process of combating collagen breakdown?

I wanted to discuss some of these ruminations with Dr. Hitzig. He  listened carefully as I told him of my speculations concerning the cause  of the illness, as well as my layman's ideas for a course of action that  might give me a chance to reduce the odds against my recovery.

Dr. Hitzig said it was clear to him that there was nothing undersized  about my will to live. He said that what was most important was that I  continue to believe in everything I had said. He shared my excitement  about the possibilities of recovery and liked the idea of a partnership.

Even before we had completed arrangements for moving out of the  hospital we began the part of the program calling for the full exercise of  the affirmative emotions as a factor in enhancing body chemistry. It was  easy enough to hope and love and have faith, but what about laughter?  Nothing is less funny than being flat on your back with all the bones in  your spine and joints hurting. A systematic program was indicated. A  good place to begin, I thought, was with amusing movies. Alien Funt,  producer of the spoofing television program "Candid Camera," sent  films of some of his CC classics, along with a motion-picture projector.

The nurse was instructed in its use. We were even able to get our hands  on some old Marx Brothers films. We pulled down the blinds and  turned on the machine.

It worked. I made the joyous discovery that ten minutes of genuine  belly laughter had an anaesthetic effect and would give me at least two  hours of pain free sleep. When the pain-killing effect of the laughter  wore off, we would switch on the motion-picture projector again, and,  not infrequently, it would lead to another pain-free sleep interval.  Sometimes, the nurse read to me out of a trove of humour books.  Especially useful were E.B. and Katherine White's Subtreasury of  American Humour and Max Eastman's The Enjoyment of Laughter.

How scientific was it to believe that laughter — as well as the positive emotions in general — was affecting my body chemistry for the  better? If laughter did in fact have a salutary effect on the body's chemistry, it seemed at least theoretically likely that it would enhance the  system's ability to fight the inflammation. So we took sedimentation  rate readings just before as well as several hours after the laughter  episodes. Each time, there was a drop of at least five points. The drop  by itself was not substantial, but it held and was cumulative. I was  greatly elated by the discovery that there is a physiologic basis for the  ancient theory that laughter is good medicine.

Greek theatre mask used by the comic actors.

There was, however, one negative side-effect of the laughter from  the standpoint of the hospital. I was disturbing other patients. But that  objection didn't last very long, for the arrangements were now complete for me to move my act to a hotel room.

One of the incidental advantages of the hotel room, I was delighted  to find, was that it cost only about one-third as much as the hospital.  The other benefits were incalculable. I would not be awakened for a  bed bath or for meals or for medication or for a change of bed sheets or  for tests or for examinations by hospital interns. The sense of serenity  was delicious and would, I felt certain, contribute to a general improvement.

What about ascorbic acid and its place in the general program for  recovery? In discussing my speculations about vitamin C with Dr.  Hitzig, I found him completely open-minded on the subject, although  he told me of serious questions that had been raised by scientific studies. He also cautioned me that heavy doses of ascorbic acid carried  some risk of renal damage. The main problem right then, however, was  not my kidneys; it seemed to me that, on balance, the risk was worth  taking. I asked Dr. Hitzig about previous recorded experience with  massive doses of vitamin C. He ascertained that at the hospital there  had been cases in which patients had received up to 3 grams by intra muscular injection.

As I thought about the injection procedure, some questions came to  mind. Introducing the ascorbic acid directly into the bloodstream might  make more effective use of the vitamin, but I wondered about the  body's ability to utilize a sudden, massive infusion. I knew that one of  the great advantages of vitamin C is that the body takes only the  amount necessary for its purposes and excretes the rest. Again, there  came to mind Cannon's phrase — the wisdom of the body.

Was there a coefficient of time in the utilization of ascorbic acid? The more I thought about it, the more likely it seemed to me that the  body would excrete a large quantity of the vitamin because it couldn't  metabolize it fast enough. I wondered whether a better procedure than  injection would be to administer the ascorbic acid through slow intra venous drip over a period of three or four hours. In this way we could  go far beyond 3 grams. My hope was to start at 10 grams and then  increase the dose daily until we reached 25 grams.

Dr. Hitzig's eyes widened when I mentioned 25 grams. This amount was far beyond any recorded dose.

He said he had to caution me about  the possible effect not just on the kidneys but on the veins in the arms.  Moreover, he said he knew of no data to support the assumption that  the body could handle 25 grams over a four-hour period, other than by  excreting it rapidly through the urine.

As before, however, it seemed to me we were playing for bigger  stakes: losing some veins was not of major importance alongside the  need to combat whatever was eating at my connective tissue.

To. know whether we were on the right track we took a sedimentation test before the first intravenous administration of 10 grams of  ascorbic. Four hours later, we took another sedimentation test. There  was a drop of nine full points.

Seldom had I known such elation. The ascorbic acid was cutting  heavily into whatever poison was attacking the connective tissue. The  fever was receding, and the pulse was no longer racing.

We stepped up the dosage. On the second day we went to 12.5  grams of ascorbic acid, on the third day, 15 grams, and so on until the  end of the week, when we reached 25 grams. Meanwhile, the laughter  routine was in full force. I was completely off drugs and sleeping pills. ;

Sleep — blessed, natural sleep without pain — was becoming increasingly prolonged, j

At the end of the eighth day I was able to move thumbs without S  pain. By this time, the sedimentation rate was somewhere in the 80s  and dropping fast. I couldn't be sure, but it seemed to me that the gravel-like nodules on my neck and the backs of my hands were beginning  to shrink. There was no doubt in my mind that I was going to make it  back all the way. I could function, and the feeling was indescribably  beautiful.

I must not make it appear that all my infirmities disappeared  overnight. For many months I couldn't get my arms up far enough to  reach for a book on a high shelf. My fingers weren't agile enough to do  what I wanted them to do on the organ keyboard. My neck had a limit ed turning radius. My knees were somewhat wobbly, and off and on, I  have had to wear a metal brace.

Even so, I was sufficiently recovered to go back to my job at the  "Saturday Review" full time again, and this was miracle enough for me.

Is the recovery a total one? Year by year the mobility has improved.

I have become pain-free, except for one shoulder and my knees,  although I have been able to discard the metal braces. I no longer feel a  sharp twinge in my wrists when I hit a tennis ball or golf ball, as I did  for such a long time. I can ride a horse flat out and hold a camera with  a steady hand. And I have recaptured my ambition to play the Toccata  and Fugue in D Minor, though I find the going slower and tougher than  I had hoped. My neck has a full turning radius again, despite the statement of specialists as recently as 1971 that the condition was degenerative and that I would have to adjust to a quarter turn.

It was seven years after the onset of the illness before I had scientific confirmation about the dangers of using aspirin in the treatment of  collagen diseases. In its May 8, 1971 issue, Lancet published a study  by Drs. M.A. Sahud and R.J. Cohen showing that aspirin can be antagonistic to the retention of-vitamin C in the body. The authors said that  patients with rheumatoid arthritis should take vitamin C supplements,  since it has often been noted that they have low levels of the vitamin in  their blood. It was no surprise, then, that I had been able to absorb such  massive amounts of ascorbic acid without kidney or other complications.

What conclusions do I draw from the entire experience?

The first is that the will to live is not a theoretical abstraction, but a'  physiologic reality with therapeutic characteristics. The second is that I  was incredibly fortunate to have as my doctor a man who knew that his  biggest job was to encourage to the fullest the patient's will to live and  to mobilize all the natural resources of body and mind to combat disease. Dr. Hitzig was willing to set aside the large and often hazardous  armamemtarium of powerful drugs available to the modem physician  when he became convinced that his patient might have something better to offer. He was also wise enough to know that the art of healing is  still a frontier profession. And, though I can't be sure of this point, I  have a hunch he believed that my own total involvement was a major  factor in my recovery.

People have asked what I thought when I was told by the specialists  that my disease was progressive and incurable.

The answer is simple. Since I didn't accept the verdict, I wasn't  trapped in the cycle of fear, depression, and panic that frequently  accompanies a supposedly incurable illness. I must not make it seem,  however, that I was unmindful of the seriousness of the problem or that

I was in a festive mood throughout. Being unable to move my body  was all the evidence I needed that the specialists were dealing with real  concerns. But deep down, I knew I had a good chance and relished the  idea of bucking the odds.

Adam Smith, in his book. Powers of the Mind, says he discussed  my recovery with some of his doctor friends, asking them to explain  why the combination of laughter and ascorbic acid worked so well. The  answer he got was that neither laughter nor ascorbic acid had anything  to do 'with it and that I probably would have recovered if nothing had  been done.

Maybe so, but that was not the opinion of the specialists at the time.

Two or three doctors, reflecting on the Adam Smith account, have  commented that I was probably the beneficiary of a mammoth venture  in self-administered placebos.

Such a hypothesis bothers me not at all. Respectable names in the  history of medicine, like Paracelsus, Holmes, and Osier, have suggest ed that the history of medication is far more the history of the placebo  effect than of intrinsically valuable and relevant drugs. Such modalities ; as bleeding (in a single year, 1827, France imported 33 million leeches   after its domestic supplies had been depleted); purging through emetics; physical contact with unicorn horns, bezoar stones, mandrakes, or '  powdered mummies — all such treatments were no doubt regarded by  physicians at the time as specifics with empirical sanction. But today's medical science recognizes that whatever efficacy these treatments  may have had — and the records indicate that the results were often surprisingly in line with expectations — was probably related to the power of the placebo....

I was absolutely convinced, at the time I was deep in my illness,  that intravenous doses of ascorbic acid could be beneficial — and they  were. It is quite possible that this treatment — like everything else I did  — was a demonstration of the placebo effect....

What we are talking about essentially, I suppose, is the chemistry of  the will to live. In Bucharest in 1972, I visited the clinic of Ana Asian,  described to me as one of Romania's leading endocrinologists. She  spoke of her belief that there is a direct connection between a robust  will to live and the chemical balances in the brain. She is convinced  that creativity — one aspect of the will to live — produces the vital  brain impulses that stimulate the pituitary gland, triggering effects on

the pineal gland and the whole of the endocrine system. Is it possible  that placebos have a key role in this process? Shouldn't this entire area  be worth serious and sustained attention?

If I had to guess, I would say that the principal contribution made  by my doctor to the taming, and possibly the conquest, of my illness  was that he encouraged me to believe I was a respected partner with  him in the total undertaking. He fully engaged my subjective energies.  He may not have been able to define or diagnose the process through  which self-confidence (wild hunches securely believed) was somehow  picked up by the body's immunologic mechanisms and translated into  antimorbid effects, but he was acting, I believe, in the best tradition of  medicine in recognizing that he had to reach out in my case beyond the  usual verifiable modalities. In so doing, he was faithful to the first dictum in his medical education: above all, do not harm.

Sometimes else I have learned. I have learned never to underestimate the capacity of the human mind and body to regenerate — even  when the prospects seem most wretched. The life-force may be the  least understood force on earth. William James said that human  beings tend to live too far within self-imposed limits. It is possible that  these limits will recede when we respect more fully the natural drive  of the human mind and body toward perfectibility and regeneration.  Protecting and cherishing that natural drive may well represent the  finest exercise of human freedom.

From Norman Cousins, Anatomy of an Illness, 

Bantam Books, New York, 1979